| April 2, 2004 | Order overruling Defendants’ objections to summary judgment evidence. This evidence included: “Local Church” chapters drafted two years after the first printing of ECNR, as well as other affidavits and deposition testimony. The unpublished chapters admit: “The Local Church … is unique among the groups in this encyclopedia. It is not a cult in the negative sense of the term, nor do the characteristics of cults in the Introduction generally apply to them.” |
| April 2, 2004 | Order denying Defendants’ motion to stay (delay) discovery during Defendants’ appeal based on his ruling in the March 31, 2004, telephone hearing. |
| March 31, 2004 | In a telephone hearing Judge Kent Sullivan denied Defendants’ motion to strike all of Plaintiffs’ experts, based on Defendants’ unwillingness to affirm or deny the truth or falsity of the charges in the book regarding the Plaintiffs. Judge Sullivan ruled that all ten of the Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses may testify. |
| December 16, 2002 | Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion To Compel Production Of Documents |
| December 16, 2002 | Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order and for Limitation of Discovery |
Pages
- ► Home
- ► E-Books
- Voices of Confirmation
- The Local Churches…
- Concerning Our Teaching
- Responses to an Open Letter (1)
- Responses to an Open Letter (2)
- Hear Our Defense (1)— Bible, Truth, Incarnation
- Hear Our Defense (2)— The Divine Trinity
- Hear Our Defense (3)— The State of Christendom
- Hear Our Defense (4)— Against False Witness
- ► Dialogues
- ► Responses
- ► Topics
- List of Titles
- ► Booklets
- Beliefs and Practices
- The Revelation of the Triune God
- The Triune God: Belief and Experience
- Modalism, Tritheism, or the Pure Revelation
- False Accusations Exposed
- The Clear Scriptural Revelaton…
- The Truth Concerning Exclusivism
- The Truth Concerning Salvation
- What a Heresy!
- Mind Bending or Mind Renewing?
- Concerning the Person of Christ
- ► To ‘An Open Letter’
- ► To Norman Geislerand Ron Rhodes
- Making Creeds, Not the Bible, the Rule of Faith
- Insisting on ‘Persons’ as a Test of Orthodoxy
- False Accusation of Patripassianism
- Denying the Co-working of the Father and the Son
- Scholars Affirm the Working Together of the Three
- Denying the ‘Son’ Is the ‘Eternal Father’ in Isaiah 9:6
- Denying 2 Cor. 3:17 Refers to Christ
- Scholars Who Affirm the Lord is the Spirit
- Denying the Infinite God Became a Finite Man
- Scholars Affirm the Infinite God Became a Finite Man
- Misplaced Criticism of Twofoldness of Divine Truth
- Govett, The Twofoldness of Divine Truth
- Misrepresenting Critique of Christianity
- Misrepresenting Witness Lee/Defending Catholic Church
- Double Standard re: Criticism of Catholic Church
- Critiques of Christianity—Bibliography/Biographical Notes
- Repeating False Witness re: Litigiousness
- Repeating False Witness re: SCP Bankruptcy
- Repeating False Witness re: ECNR Litigation
- Practicing Matthew 18
- Harvest House Lawsuits
- Voices of Confirmation
- ► Libel Litigations
- Links
-
Meta

Bible Answer Man Broadcast Excerpts